<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS Tip #2: Structural Naming Convention in CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archana</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-137230</link>
		<dc:creator>Archana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-137230</guid>
		<description>Nice Article about naming conventions. Thanks for the info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Article about naming conventions. Thanks for the info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skaman Sam</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-108038</link>
		<dc:creator>Skaman Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-108038</guid>
		<description>I really liked this article and sent it to my rails dev team. In my professional life, I prefer to think of #header and #footer and general areas, then get more specific, with hyphen-levelling, such as: 

#header, #header-logo, #header-logo-text, #header-motto,#header-motto-emphasis, #header-funnyPerson-head-rightEye-eyebrow-hairFolicle

This just makes sense to me. It can make the selectors a bit long, but is perfect for parsing with regex. 

As a bonus, Rails like to create name with underscores to separate objects, so I will name them #header-name in my code, and Rails with turn it into something like #header-name_person_name. I can then find the objects by splitting the id at each underscore. Nifty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked this article and sent it to my rails dev team. In my professional life, I prefer to think of #header and #footer and general areas, then get more specific, with hyphen-levelling, such as: </p>
<p>#header, #header-logo, #header-logo-text, #header-motto,#header-motto-emphasis, #header-funnyPerson-head-rightEye-eyebrow-hairFolicle</p>
<p>This just makes sense to me. It can make the selectors a bit long, but is perfect for parsing with regex. </p>
<p>As a bonus, Rails like to create name with underscores to separate objects, so I will name them #header-name in my code, and Rails with turn it into something like #header-name_person_name. I can then find the objects by splitting the id at each underscore. Nifty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-106731</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-106731</guid>
		<description>This is just like HTML5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just like HTML5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooljaz124</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-78429</link>
		<dc:creator>cooljaz124</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-78429</guid>
		<description>Yes, Point taken. Very nice one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Point taken. Very nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aziz</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-68680</link>
		<dc:creator>Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-68680</guid>
		<description>this is really great post. I’ll apply this when writing CSS such impart new knowledge on me…thanks for the share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is really great post. I’ll apply this when writing CSS such impart new knowledge on me…thanks for the share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ko</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-68679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-68679</guid>
		<description>The one thing I hate about design is how all of the different browsers are different and need to be accounted for.

I use resets a bit but probably not enough and many designs therefore are flawed in so many browsers because of this (Why can’t everyone just use FireFox?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing I hate about design is how all of the different browsers are different and need to be accounted for.</p>
<p>I use resets a bit but probably not enough and many designs therefore are flawed in so many browsers because of this (Why can’t everyone just use FireFox?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimball Le</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-64187</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimball Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-64187</guid>
		<description>how do you feel about css frameworks such as 960 gs and the naming of classes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do you feel about css frameworks such as 960 gs and the naming of classes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidra Blue</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-61082</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidra Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-61082</guid>
		<description>Good read, although personally, I hate long names that take up valuable filesize. With the way most websites are, you would want to reduce as much as possible, your filesizes that are being downloaded for a view.

There are the standard class names which would be common for all sites like #header, #footer, #content, but everything else is normally different these days.

Coming up with shorter but easily understandable names, (eg using ll in place of left, or rr in place of right, etc) and have an accompanying document on how these class names are so, would hopefully help Dave Newbie easily understand and help them &quot;immediately start work without having to constantly scratch their heads&quot;

Most would probably disagree though, but that&#039;s just our way =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read, although personally, I hate long names that take up valuable filesize. With the way most websites are, you would want to reduce as much as possible, your filesizes that are being downloaded for a view.</p>
<p>There are the standard class names which would be common for all sites like #header, #footer, #content, but everything else is normally different these days.</p>
<p>Coming up with shorter but easily understandable names, (eg using ll in place of left, or rr in place of right, etc) and have an accompanying document on how these class names are so, would hopefully help Dave Newbie easily understand and help them &#8220;immediately start work without having to constantly scratch their heads&#8221;</p>
<p>Most would probably disagree though, but that&#8217;s just our way =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irene</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-54420</link>
		<dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-54420</guid>
		<description>Thx,This is really useful for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx,This is really useful for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Bauer</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/css-tips/css-tip-2-structural-naming-convention-in-css/#comment-42490</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=242#comment-42490</guid>
		<description>Excellent read, I didn&#039;t even realize I was making some of these trivial mistakes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent read, I didn&#8217;t even realize I was making some of these trivial mistakes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

