<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Embracing and Using CSS3 Pragmatically</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tuck</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95745</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 05:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95745</guid>
		<description>The New Riders book &quot;Designing with Progressive Enhancement,&quot; by Parker, Toland, Jehl, and Wachs, is tremendously useful for this area of inquiry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Riders book &#8220;Designing with Progressive Enhancement,&#8221; by Parker, Toland, Jehl, and Wachs, is tremendously useful for this area of inquiry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gleenk</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95615</link>
		<dc:creator>Gleenk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95615</guid>
		<description>Nice post but I&#039;ll have gone deep into the &quot;progressive&quot; analysis. It could be more interesting ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post but I&#8217;ll have gone deep into the &#8220;progressive&#8221; analysis. It could be more interesting ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Griffin</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95386</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95386</guid>
		<description>@Spicer: Where&#039;s the &quot;like&quot; button?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spicer: Where&#8217;s the &#8220;like&#8221; button?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Gube</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95337</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@James: &lt;/strong&gt;I&#039;m not sure where you got that from; I had to re-read the article to see where your assumption came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@James: </strong>I&#8217;m not sure where you got that from; I had to re-read the article to see where your assumption came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95330</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95330</guid>
		<description>For using the CSS3 options in IE browser, we could add the javascript in document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For using the CSS3 options in IE browser, we could add the javascript in document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Peterson</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95320</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95320</guid>
		<description>The biggest issue I&#039;ve had is educating clients on CSS3.

We&#039;ll typically present a design with the intention of using CSS 3 for different elements (rounded corners, gradients, etc) and have to educate them that older browsers will see something a little different.

It can be difficult for them to grasp that more advanced browsers will see this, but not all.  

Normally, when I give them the explanation that we CAN make it look like this in all browsers, but it will load slower and be more expensive because we need to use images... they accept it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest issue I&#8217;ve had is educating clients on CSS3.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll typically present a design with the intention of using CSS 3 for different elements (rounded corners, gradients, etc) and have to educate them that older browsers will see something a little different.</p>
<p>It can be difficult for them to grasp that more advanced browsers will see this, but not all.  </p>
<p>Normally, when I give them the explanation that we CAN make it look like this in all browsers, but it will load slower and be more expensive because we need to use images&#8230; they accept it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabiana Simões</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95306</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabiana Simões</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95306</guid>
		<description>Well pointed, we have to keep in mind who is our audience.

I guess, if most of your audience is using browsers that support CSS3 properties, you should go with graceful degradation over progressive enhancement, so that you can really take advantage of latest features instead of just adding some rounded corners here and there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well pointed, we have to keep in mind who is our audience.</p>
<p>I guess, if most of your audience is using browsers that support CSS3 properties, you should go with graceful degradation over progressive enhancement, so that you can really take advantage of latest features instead of just adding some rounded corners here and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hds</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95300</link>
		<dc:creator>Hds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95300</guid>
		<description>That was a very informational article, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a very informational article, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spicer Matthews</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95287</link>
		<dc:creator>Spicer Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95287</guid>
		<description>Great post. We at Skyclerk just made the tough decision to kill IE7 support. http://skyclerk.com/blog/attention-internet-explorer-7-users We want to focus our design and programing energies on the future and not get hung up on the past. 

It was a big decision. We are more or less discontinuing support for a chunk of our supportive users. We feel by doing this we can dive deeper into css3, html5, and cool javascript stuff. 

I love reading postings like this because it is one more step towards wide acceptance of new technologies and funeral of old tech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. We at Skyclerk just made the tough decision to kill IE7 support. <a href="http://skyclerk.com/blog/attention-internet-explorer-7-users" rel="nofollow">http://skyclerk.com/blog/attention-internet-explorer-7-users</a> We want to focus our design and programing energies on the future and not get hung up on the past. </p>
<p>It was a big decision. We are more or less discontinuing support for a chunk of our supportive users. We feel by doing this we can dive deeper into css3, html5, and cool javascript stuff. </p>
<p>I love reading postings like this because it is one more step towards wide acceptance of new technologies and funeral of old tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Griffin</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/css/embracing-and-using-css3-pragmatically/#comment-95281</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5107#comment-95281</guid>
		<description>This sentence really irks me:
&quot;even though it’s not supported by all browsers (like IE6)&quot;

Duh. IE9 is now the standard. IE6 is a decade old. Microsoft itself has declared IE6 is dead and they are recruiting us to help them kill it. By reminding people to even consider it is perpetuating the problem.
It&#039;s time to drop support for IE6 for good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sentence really irks me:<br />
&#8220;even though it’s not supported by all browsers (like IE6)&#8221;</p>
<p>Duh. IE9 is now the standard. IE6 is a decade old. Microsoft itself has declared IE6 is dead and they are recruiting us to help them kill it. By reminding people to even consider it is perpetuating the problem.<br />
It&#8217;s time to drop support for IE6 for good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
