Face it, this is society as we know it today. The only feature that is considered adequate, pleasing, or generally the most approved for girls and women is beauty. Not beauty in a sub-context, like “the lines on the Sgt. Rock piece” or “the colour expressed in the depiction of Tom Baker”… but just plain __physically__ beautiful. (Deriatives includes: elegant, glamorous, sexy, bodacious, curvy, lusty, etc., etc. … could this be a result of the ancient goal of the woman’s only goal to “please the man” way before the feminist movement?) That’s why drag kings and sk8er/punk girls are a big relief in today’s progressive society. We are starting to see archetypes carved into the lexicon of female characteristics that has nothing to do with beauty. Why do ppl don’t give two sh*its how ugly most Hollywood actors look but actually focus on their craft? And vice versa?

Your comment is uncalled for and highly misinformed. I suggest you do some research into the digital art medium. I strongly believe you will come out realising that digital artists are just as talented as traditional artists and put in just as much time and effort into their creations.

Digital art is not a process of a few clicks to turn out a masterpiece like these. Get out of your tiny little world and think before you speak.

For me it’s all a hobby, so it’s more than flattering to be featured alongside such talented folks.