<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The History of Web Browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-57638</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-57638</guid>
		<description>What about Lynx? I used that all the time in the early 90&#039;s.  I had no graphic capability until 1998 or so, and Lynx was an ideal text-based browser for my situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Lynx? I used that all the time in the early 90&#8217;s.  I had no graphic capability until 1998 or so, and Lynx was an ideal text-based browser for my situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexlex</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-55746</link>
		<dc:creator>alexlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-55746</guid>
		<description>Nice work, my browser is FireFox.. great work, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, my browser is FireFox.. great work, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoomzoom</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-52776</link>
		<dc:creator>zoomzoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-52776</guid>
		<description>Jeff.K: seems like you are some immature kid. seen your &quot;website&quot; and you dont have any right to criticize this awesome article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff.K: seems like you are some immature kid. seen your &#8220;website&#8221; and you dont have any right to criticize this awesome article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P Smith</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-51592</link>
		<dc:creator>P Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-51592</guid>
		<description>Calling this a &quot;history&quot; is like calling a couple of index cards an encyclopedia.  There are so many more facets of browser history such as Mosaic being open source and borrowed/stolen for Netscape and Microshaft&#039;s Spyglass (later Infernal Exploder), the plethora of niche browsers (many based on Active-X) in the late 1990s, and the failed history of WAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling this a &#8220;history&#8221; is like calling a couple of index cards an encyclopedia.  There are so many more facets of browser history such as Mosaic being open source and borrowed/stolen for Netscape and Microshaft&#8217;s Spyglass (later Infernal Exploder), the plethora of niche browsers (many based on Active-X) in the late 1990s, and the failed history of WAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-49313</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-49313</guid>
		<description>Well I didn&#039;t know that Mozilla was formed in 1998... my browser is FireFox.. great work, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I didn&#8217;t know that Mozilla was formed in 1998&#8230; my browser is FireFox.. great work, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-47781</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-47781</guid>
		<description>@HO Firefox tabs where there well before Chrome was a gleam in Google&#039;s eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HO Firefox tabs where there well before Chrome was a gleam in Google&#8217;s eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glyconutrients</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-47779</link>
		<dc:creator>glyconutrients</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-47779</guid>
		<description>Missing two VERY important ones.

Lynx, which was already mentioned by another reader, and AOL, which was HUGE in mid-late 90&#039;s.

I also think it is important to indicate release of IE and NN 4.0 as this there were MAJOR changes in stylesheets, DHTML, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missing two VERY important ones.</p>
<p>Lynx, which was already mentioned by another reader, and AOL, which was HUGE in mid-late 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I also think it is important to indicate release of IE and NN 4.0 as this there were MAJOR changes in stylesheets, DHTML, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yang</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-47775</link>
		<dc:creator>Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-47775</guid>
		<description>Google chrome I just like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google chrome I just like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux And Friends</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-47769</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux And Friends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-47769</guid>
		<description>Wow that is one huge image. Nevertheless tastefully done. 

You have not covered some of the more prominent albeit lesser known web browsers such as Konqueror, Galeon, Dillo, Text only browsers like Links and so on. 

Nice compilation though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that is one huge image. Nevertheless tastefully done. </p>
<p>You have not covered some of the more prominent albeit lesser known web browsers such as Konqueror, Galeon, Dillo, Text only browsers like Links and so on. </p>
<p>Nice compilation though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HO</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/the-history-of-web-browsers/#comment-47675</link>
		<dc:creator>HO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1703#comment-47675</guid>
		<description>not much elaborated, a quick rushed out review perhaps. I should have been share the article.
btw, IE7 tab feature adopted from FF?? Google Chrome is lightweight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not much elaborated, a quick rushed out review perhaps. I should have been share the article.<br />
btw, IE7 tab feature adopted from FF?? Google Chrome is lightweight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
