<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building the 3D Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-139919</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-139919</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jeff, but this is a terrible article! I like Sixrevisions, however, I expect better research than wikipedia.

All this article does is feed the stereotype and add confusion to the market!

You shouldn&#039;t be mixing CGI &quot;3D&quot; with Stereo3D (S3D)! It was similar nonsense that helped kill 3D in the 50s, when, by the way, they primarily used polarisation as now (all be it slightly different)! Anaglyph was used in the 20s.

The article alludes to being about S3D, but is mostly about 2D CGI. What information there is about S3D is mostly wrong... you guys should be ashamed of yourselves!

I&#039;ll be reading your articles with much more sceptisim in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jeff, but this is a terrible article! I like Sixrevisions, however, I expect better research than wikipedia.</p>
<p>All this article does is feed the stereotype and add confusion to the market!</p>
<p>You shouldn&#8217;t be mixing CGI &#8220;3D&#8221; with Stereo3D (S3D)! It was similar nonsense that helped kill 3D in the 50s, when, by the way, they primarily used polarisation as now (all be it slightly different)! Anaglyph was used in the 20s.</p>
<p>The article alludes to being about S3D, but is mostly about 2D CGI. What information there is about S3D is mostly wrong&#8230; you guys should be ashamed of yourselves!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be reading your articles with much more sceptisim in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xandor Schiefer</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-125586</link>
		<dc:creator>Xandor Schiefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-125586</guid>
		<description>You did not mention WebGL? That&#039;s where the future of 3D on the web is IMHO. Support for it is NATIVE in Firefox, Chrome, Safari (currently disabled by default) and in dev builds of Opera. It uses hardware accelation, HTML5 and JavaScript, there are several JS libraries available for it already, like A3 or J3D, or many others (see Wikipedia).

Flash = not cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did not mention WebGL? That&#8217;s where the future of 3D on the web is IMHO. Support for it is NATIVE in Firefox, Chrome, Safari (currently disabled by default) and in dev builds of Opera. It uses hardware accelation, HTML5 and JavaScript, there are several JS libraries available for it already, like A3 or J3D, or many others (see Wikipedia).</p>
<p>Flash = not cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xiant</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-120165</link>
		<dc:creator>xiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 22:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-120165</guid>
		<description>Thanks...I&#039;d like to see a real3D website like 3Dmovies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230;I&#8217;d like to see a real3D website like 3Dmovies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-112657</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-112657</guid>
		<description>Too many 3D sites with Flash :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many 3D sites with Flash :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-110507</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-110507</guid>
		<description>This article is very intriguing. I hadn&#039;t pondered upon the concept, nor did I know that 3D was introduced in 1952. Brilliantly written too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is very intriguing. I hadn&#8217;t pondered upon the concept, nor did I know that 3D was introduced in 1952. Brilliantly written too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-110100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-110100</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeff, cool 3D article, nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeff, cool 3D article, nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Cole</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-109995</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-109995</guid>
		<description>I used to hear of 3D technology in televisions, but 3D Web? Wow, the advancements in technology is so fast and challenging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to hear of 3D technology in televisions, but 3D Web? Wow, the advancements in technology is so fast and challenging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimal</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-109404</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-109404</guid>
		<description>Actually I do not know much about 3D, but by reading this article at least I learned how the 3D web that. Thank you, Jeff, the article is very useful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I do not know much about 3D, but by reading this article at least I learned how the 3D web that. Thank you, Jeff, the article is very useful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thijs Leydens</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-109337</link>
		<dc:creator>Thijs Leydens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-109337</guid>
		<description>Nice overview of 3D technology. I remember that, in my time as a VJ, Philips tried to launch no-glasses 3D screens (I believe they were called WOW screens) around 2005. Expensive, and not the right timing back then.

Anyway, I would like to note that, aside from the technological developments, the main question really should be: Why would you do it? Would you be able get your message across more effectively, to browse more intuitively, or have more effective meetings or conversations?

I would expext yes, but it&#039;s a little hard to get a grasp of all opportunities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice overview of 3D technology. I remember that, in my time as a VJ, Philips tried to launch no-glasses 3D screens (I believe they were called WOW screens) around 2005. Expensive, and not the right timing back then.</p>
<p>Anyway, I would like to note that, aside from the technological developments, the main question really should be: Why would you do it? Would you be able get your message across more effectively, to browse more intuitively, or have more effective meetings or conversations?</p>
<p>I would expext yes, but it&#8217;s a little hard to get a grasp of all opportunities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web-technology/building-the-3d-web/#comment-109053</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=5646#comment-109053</guid>
		<description>I think it will need some time until there will be a &quot;3D&quot;-wave in the web. 3D-websites look great, no question, but I really hate it if a website needs 15, 30 or more seconds to load. But nevertheless I think there will be a &quot;3D&quot;-wave in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will need some time until there will be a &#8220;3D&#8221;-wave in the web. 3D-websites look great, no question, but I really hate it if a website needs 15, 30 or more seconds to load. But nevertheless I think there will be a &#8220;3D&#8221;-wave in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
