<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Basic Look at Typography in Web Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: j_hatfield</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-131595</link>
		<dc:creator>j_hatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-131595</guid>
		<description>This is a great tutorial, I&#039;ve been looking for a blog to show my clients who know very little about type (the kind that thinks &quot;bleeding cowboys&quot; looks good on anything) and I love the example websites you provided. I did find this article that gives a brief tutorial that might be good for some people who have a good idea about fonts but maybe just need a refresher course:

http://www.back40design.com/news/m.blog/22/communicate-trust-through-typography</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great tutorial, I&#8217;ve been looking for a blog to show my clients who know very little about type (the kind that thinks &#8220;bleeding cowboys&#8221; looks good on anything) and I love the example websites you provided. I did find this article that gives a brief tutorial that might be good for some people who have a good idea about fonts but maybe just need a refresher course:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.back40design.com/news/m.blog/22/communicate-trust-through-typography" rel="nofollow">http://www.back40design.com/news/m.blog/22/communicate-trust-through-typography</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anni</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-87228</link>
		<dc:creator>Anni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-87228</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Shannon, for this helpful website!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Shannon, for this helpful website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Gassmann</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-87017</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gassmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-87017</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t see the post date. Blame it on the twitter bot that linked here. You&#039;re probably already dropping sIFR from your suggested rotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t see the post date. Blame it on the twitter bot that linked here. You&#8217;re probably already dropping sIFR from your suggested rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Gassmann</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-87014</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gassmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-87014</guid>
		<description>Shannon,

sIFR is kind of dead. Hasn&#039;t been updated since 2008 and even the developer knows that it is not the best solution. With @font-face, cufon and the rest, I think it&#039;s time to stop talking about sIFR. As much as I liked it and used it, I have since moved to Cufon and Typekit. Best and easiest IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon,</p>
<p>sIFR is kind of dead. Hasn&#8217;t been updated since 2008 and even the developer knows that it is not the best solution. With @font-face, cufon and the rest, I think it&#8217;s time to stop talking about sIFR. As much as I liked it and used it, I have since moved to Cufon and Typekit. Best and easiest IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-76483</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 20:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-76483</guid>
		<description>Great overview of the basics of web typography! Fantastic perspective with valuable practical tips. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great overview of the basics of web typography! Fantastic perspective with valuable practical tips. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seaton</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-76361</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-76361</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I notice that you claim sans-serif is more readable on computer displays, but you link to an unsourced sentence in a Wikipedia article. Why not just say &quot;because your cousin&#039;s uncle said so?&quot;

I don&#039;t mean to sound harsh, and sure, maybe sans-serif is more readable, but it would be nice to see some actual evidence backing up that claim before I base any design choices around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I notice that you claim sans-serif is more readable on computer displays, but you link to an unsourced sentence in a Wikipedia article. Why not just say &#8220;because your cousin&#8217;s uncle said so?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to sound harsh, and sure, maybe sans-serif is more readable, but it would be nice to see some actual evidence backing up that claim before I base any design choices around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiran</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-76286</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-76286</guid>
		<description>Thank you Shannon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Shannon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoeliePoelie</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-75939</link>
		<dc:creator>NoeliePoelie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-75939</guid>
		<description>I am an old, retired typographer and it is great to read an article by someone who loves type. Go raibh maith agat.

Dublin, ireland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an old, retired typographer and it is great to read an article by someone who loves type. Go raibh maith agat.</p>
<p>Dublin, ireland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davie-Boy</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-70667</link>
		<dc:creator>Davie-Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 04:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-70667</guid>
		<description>Good news for all you font lovers out there. A revolution is slowly taking place regarding the use of fonts on the internet. Keep an eye on the fontshop. They&#039;re one of the original font developers from way back when photo-typesetting was a new technology (late 1970&#039;s- early 80&#039;s). This is what they&#039;re saying: 
&quot;Most fonts are designed to be used in desktop applications for design that will be printed or output as an image file or PDF. Web fonts are an entirely new category of fonts optimized for use on web pages using the @font-face rule. This fairly new addition to CSS allows fonts to be linked in web pages and downloaded by browsers so that anyone who visits the page can view the fonts declared by the page’s designer. This means your website can display indexable, editable, resizable, dynamic HTML text in a font other than the handful of “web safe” options we’ve had to rely on for years.&quot;
Read more here:
http://www.fontshop.com/blog/?cat=80&amp;utm_source=NewsletterFeb2410&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_content=WebVersion&amp;utm_term=em&amp;utm_campaign=FF52Web</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for all you font lovers out there. A revolution is slowly taking place regarding the use of fonts on the internet. Keep an eye on the fontshop. They&#8217;re one of the original font developers from way back when photo-typesetting was a new technology (late 1970&#8242;s- early 80&#8242;s). This is what they&#8217;re saying:<br />
&#8220;Most fonts are designed to be used in desktop applications for design that will be printed or output as an image file or PDF. Web fonts are an entirely new category of fonts optimized for use on web pages using the @font-face rule. This fairly new addition to CSS allows fonts to be linked in web pages and downloaded by browsers so that anyone who visits the page can view the fonts declared by the page’s designer. This means your website can display indexable, editable, resizable, dynamic HTML text in a font other than the handful of “web safe” options we’ve had to rely on for years.&#8221;<br />
Read more here:<br />
<a href="http://www.fontshop.com/blog/?cat=80&#038;utm_source=NewsletterFeb2410&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_content=WebVersion&#038;utm_term=em&#038;utm_campaign=FF52Web" rel="nofollow">http://www.fontshop.com/blog/?cat=80&#038;utm_source=NewsletterFeb2410&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_content=WebVersion&#038;utm_term=em&#038;utm_campaign=FF52Web</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/a-basic-look-at-typography-in-web-design/#comment-64767</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=2814#comment-64767</guid>
		<description>&quot;In my opinion, it is *how* the font is used which determines whether sans serif or serif fonts are best for any given example.&quot;

Correct, however correctly used serif trumps sans for printed work 100% of the time. Screen is somewhat different because serifs break at smaller sizes due to low res (compared to print).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In my opinion, it is *how* the font is used which determines whether sans serif or serif fonts are best for any given example.&#8221;</p>
<p>Correct, however correctly used serif trumps sans for printed work 100% of the time. Screen is somewhat different because serifs break at smaller sizes due to low res (compared to print).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

