<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Color: The Next Limited Resource?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Paul Gedeon</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-107414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Paul Gedeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-107414</guid>
		<description>We use JPG green.

Love it.

274-1 C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use JPG green.</p>
<p>Love it.</p>
<p>274-1 C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cre8ive Commando</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-79152</link>
		<dc:creator>Cre8ive Commando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-79152</guid>
		<description>Colours running out, it&#039;s a scary concept but interesting to think about none the less. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colours running out, it&#8217;s a scary concept but interesting to think about none the less. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-76427</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-76427</guid>
		<description>Barbie had a magenta phone before T-Mobile was founded, Therefore Mattel can sue T-Mobile. 
Prior art FTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbie had a magenta phone before T-Mobile was founded, Therefore Mattel can sue T-Mobile.<br />
Prior art FTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-70140</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-70140</guid>
		<description>Metallica tried to trademark a music note once...  this is just as silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metallica tried to trademark a music note once&#8230;  this is just as silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-67872</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-67872</guid>
		<description>This is totally insane! I&#039;ll be using their so called trademarked color for my projects soon. If not for the world, we wont have any color.

This is not &lt;i&gt;just&lt;i&gt; right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally insane! I&#8217;ll be using their so called trademarked color for my projects soon. If not for the world, we wont have any color.</p>
<p>This is not <i>just</i><i> right!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hkey</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-66007</link>
		<dc:creator>Hkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-66007</guid>
		<description>I refuse to respect this stupidity, I use colors as I want. ¡Ya basta!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I refuse to respect this stupidity, I use colors as I want. ¡Ya basta!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vzwpix.com</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-56859</link>
		<dc:creator>vzwpix.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-56859</guid>
		<description>They should stop it now before it gets out of hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should stop it now before it gets out of hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imokon</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-56427</link>
		<dc:creator>Imokon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-56427</guid>
		<description>You know that&#039;s funny because Suicide Girls tried to pull the trademark right on pink and lost. So it&#039;s funny to me that T-Mobile gets away with it.

And actually, random fact, you can&#039;t trademark scents period. They only trademark the colors and designs of the packaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that&#8217;s funny because Suicide Girls tried to pull the trademark right on pink and lost. So it&#8217;s funny to me that T-Mobile gets away with it.</p>
<p>And actually, random fact, you can&#8217;t trademark scents period. They only trademark the colors and designs of the packaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-55514</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-55514</guid>
		<description>This will not hold. 
By the time they register half the brands it will be chromatic chaos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will not hold.<br />
By the time they register half the brands it will be chromatic chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/color-the-next-limited-resource/#comment-55476</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=1961#comment-55476</guid>
		<description>First of all they can own the color which is a particular combination code of numbers C-M-Y-K etc. Tiffany Blue is a good example, it, like the others above, are custom blended colors that cannot be and will not be sold by Pantone to anyone else-they are custom mixed and named, I would also imagine that they trademark their custom color name to avoid infringement as well, if someone created a jewelry company and used similar shade of Tiffany blue but a few digits off in the combo they would sue because it is similar and in the same field. But if someone had a machine shop and wanted a similar shade close to Tiffany blue first of all Pantone wouldn&#039;t even have it available to reference from, but it could be figured out by perhaps another color agency and probably used by another industry without incident. Remember their are a million different combinations and hues etc to the extent we can measure it.
But this discussion leads to other similar intellectual concerns...companies and people can own real estate on the Moon, and Monsanto can own ALL the rights to ALL GMO corn to monopolize revenue on the grain industry, and whats next patenting H20 and O2 so we&#039;ll have to pay a royalty for utilizing them also? Credit card companies do the same thing they rely on credit bureaus to report bad behavior to, so that they can can then in return use the negative information they provided to the bureau about you, against you by declining or charging you higher fees. Companies buy into the problem and solutions now. &quot;He who cureth can maketh ill.&quot;
It also isn&#039;t much different than pharmaceutical companies patenting strains of viruses so that they can build vaccines and drugs around them...I shudder to think of the day when some who has an identifiable strain of cancer has to pay a royalty for having it, in addition to paying for the curative drug itself-if its even curable, and by the way they know what causes cancer in the last 100 yrs-pollution from chemicals-its obvious-nobody&#039;s chemical companies are stopping that are they? No because someone makes money off of it.  
At the end of the day, all of these companies only have one thing left to make money off of and that&#039;s intellectual property. So while everybody is worried about recycling and CO2 and the planet overheating the powers that be have been patenting and cataloguing every last living virus, disease and plant and chemical in last 100 yrs in order to make money off of it in the future...Really...just think when will those in charge have enough money? 
Happy 2010 y&#039;all, welcome to the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all they can own the color which is a particular combination code of numbers C-M-Y-K etc. Tiffany Blue is a good example, it, like the others above, are custom blended colors that cannot be and will not be sold by Pantone to anyone else-they are custom mixed and named, I would also imagine that they trademark their custom color name to avoid infringement as well, if someone created a jewelry company and used similar shade of Tiffany blue but a few digits off in the combo they would sue because it is similar and in the same field. But if someone had a machine shop and wanted a similar shade close to Tiffany blue first of all Pantone wouldn&#8217;t even have it available to reference from, but it could be figured out by perhaps another color agency and probably used by another industry without incident. Remember their are a million different combinations and hues etc to the extent we can measure it.<br />
But this discussion leads to other similar intellectual concerns&#8230;companies and people can own real estate on the Moon, and Monsanto can own ALL the rights to ALL GMO corn to monopolize revenue on the grain industry, and whats next patenting H20 and O2 so we&#8217;ll have to pay a royalty for utilizing them also? Credit card companies do the same thing they rely on credit bureaus to report bad behavior to, so that they can can then in return use the negative information they provided to the bureau about you, against you by declining or charging you higher fees. Companies buy into the problem and solutions now. &#8220;He who cureth can maketh ill.&#8221;<br />
It also isn&#8217;t much different than pharmaceutical companies patenting strains of viruses so that they can build vaccines and drugs around them&#8230;I shudder to think of the day when some who has an identifiable strain of cancer has to pay a royalty for having it, in addition to paying for the curative drug itself-if its even curable, and by the way they know what causes cancer in the last 100 yrs-pollution from chemicals-its obvious-nobody&#8217;s chemical companies are stopping that are they? No because someone makes money off of it.<br />
At the end of the day, all of these companies only have one thing left to make money off of and that&#8217;s intellectual property. So while everybody is worried about recycling and CO2 and the planet overheating the powers that be have been patenting and cataloguing every last living virus, disease and plant and chemical in last 100 yrs in order to make money off of it in the future&#8230;Really&#8230;just think when will those in charge have enough money?<br />
Happy 2010 y&#8217;all, welcome to the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

