<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Guide to Google Font API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterU</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-138255</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-138255</guid>
		<description>Hello.

I&#039;ve been playing with web fontst for a while and love the prospect of that choice!

However, if I try and print a page that references Google fonts, the printer uses ITS default instead.

Clearly the printer can only use what fonts it has installed.

But surely in our modern days, there is a way of &quot;pushing through&quot; the web font through to the printer?

If yes, how do we achieve? I&#039;m a bit lost.

Thanks,

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with web fontst for a while and love the prospect of that choice!</p>
<p>However, if I try and print a page that references Google fonts, the printer uses ITS default instead.</p>
<p>Clearly the printer can only use what fonts it has installed.</p>
<p>But surely in our modern days, there is a way of &#8220;pushing through&#8221; the web font through to the printer?</p>
<p>If yes, how do we achieve? I&#8217;m a bit lost.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablinho</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-135962</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablinho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-135962</guid>
		<description>Great selection of fonts they have... and it keeps growing.

Only problem for me is how the different the font looks from browser to browser. For example, most fonts look awful on Safari..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great selection of fonts they have&#8230; and it keeps growing.</p>
<p>Only problem for me is how the different the font looks from browser to browser. For example, most fonts look awful on Safari..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Boudreau</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-130809</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Boudreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-130809</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for this article!
I didn&#039;t know about the Google Web Font API, but now I wish I knew it sooner...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for this article!<br />
I didn&#8217;t know about the Google Web Font API, but now I wish I knew it sooner&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Durgesh</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-113622</link>
		<dc:creator>Durgesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-113622</guid>
		<description>great tutorial. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great tutorial. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figman</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-111017</link>
		<dc:creator>figman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-111017</guid>
		<description>@ugly
I believe it had nothing to do with the video card.It simply has to do with the way the OS renders the fonts within the browser.

Up to date Windows, even with ClearType enbled is the worst in regards to rendering Fonts and WebFonts alike.

This is very disappointing considering 50% of the population uses Windows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ugly<br />
I believe it had nothing to do with the video card.It simply has to do with the way the OS renders the fonts within the browser.</p>
<p>Up to date Windows, even with ClearType enbled is the worst in regards to rendering Fonts and WebFonts alike.</p>
<p>This is very disappointing considering 50% of the population uses Windows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugly</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-109715</link>
		<dc:creator>ugly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-109715</guid>
		<description>those google web fonts look pretty on my ubuntu, but pretty ugly with jagged edges on my windows. probably some video card thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those google web fonts look pretty on my ubuntu, but pretty ugly with jagged edges on my windows. probably some video card thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazzvox</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-104666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazzvox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-104666</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using Cabin on this site, other GoogleWebFonts on other sites for a while. There are still issues in Browsers, as they seem to interprete *px size and type=bold in different ways. In addition, I&#039;m not shure if CSS &#039;text-indent&#039; works out for this fonts ... in all browsers.

The &#039;bold&#039; issue is resolved by following your advice for the import-in-header link: &#039;Cabin&#124;Cabin:bold&#039;
The &#039;size&#039; issue seems to be happening for h1, h2 ... IE oversizes them, no matter what I do :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Cabin on this site, other GoogleWebFonts on other sites for a while. There are still issues in Browsers, as they seem to interprete *px size and type=bold in different ways. In addition, I&#8217;m not shure if CSS &#8216;text-indent&#8217; works out for this fonts &#8230; in all browsers.</p>
<p>The &#8216;bold&#8217; issue is resolved by following your advice for the import-in-header link: &#8216;Cabin|Cabin:bold&#8217;<br />
The &#8216;size&#8217; issue seems to be happening for h1, h2 &#8230; IE oversizes them, no matter what I do :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vale</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-102420</link>
		<dc:creator>vale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-102420</guid>
		<description>Hey it seems common ligatures aren&#039;t included in the web-fonts offered for free by Google, on the other hand they also say that paying for them will enable &quot;special features&quot; of the typeface included ligatures. Does anybody tried this out?
PS to let webkit browsers render ligatures the CSS &lt;code&gt;text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;&lt;/code&gt;
has to be set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey it seems common ligatures aren&#8217;t included in the web-fonts offered for free by Google, on the other hand they also say that paying for them will enable &#8220;special features&#8221; of the typeface included ligatures. Does anybody tried this out?<br />
PS to let webkit browsers render ligatures the CSS <code>text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;</code><br />
has to be set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-96282</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-96282</guid>
		<description>You guys probably don&#039;t care, but it should be noted that this is also another way for google to have a hit-counter on your website, so it can track who your visitors are (by means of the referer that links to their css).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys probably don&#8217;t care, but it should be noted that this is also another way for google to have a hit-counter on your website, so it can track who your visitors are (by means of the referer that links to their css).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don McArthur</title>
		<link>http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/google-font-api-guide/#comment-91113</link>
		<dc:creator>Don McArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixrevisions.com/?p=3392#comment-91113</guid>
		<description>Have you tried printing a web page that only uses web fonts? Doesn&#039;t work with up-to-date Chrome or Safari on Mac OS X, I&#039;m not sure of other resources.

Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried printing a web page that only uses web fonts? Doesn&#8217;t work with up-to-date Chrome or Safari on Mac OS X, I&#8217;m not sure of other resources.</p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

